naughtyteddy - 10 June 2008 12:30 AM

we did 2 weeks about judaism as a token gesture of integration

LOL, excellent, that’s one of the best comments I have heard in a long time.

We studied Shellsuitism in school

wasn’t that a golden brick that has been wrapped around a thinly sliced lemon?

snowball - 10 June 2008 01:47 AM

wasn’t that a golden brick that has been wrapped around a thinly sliced lemon?

Yes..yes it was, but I was to laZy to change it.

So what do you all think of “Hypocrite?”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrite

“The word hypocrisy derives from the Greek ὑπόκρισις (hypokrisis), which means “play-acting”, “acting out”, “feigning, dissembling” or “an answer”

It’s to hot to be funny

Champagne socialism , carbon environmentalism and moral relativism can be forms of hypocrisy

I meant the poem above lol.

Why do you like discussing religion so much?

You already got everybody’s opinion…

-A.Filth

If the poem is analyzed its really worth a look. Sorry if I waste your time but that is what this particular thread is about. It’s an interest of mine that’s all. 

I find religion fascinating but am also a total non-believer, no harm in knowing your enemy!

I’ve somehow managed to read thru to page 8, then skipped here, to leave a mark

well, i always thought people who believe in something beyond nature, do so coz they are afraid there isn’t anything else but HERE&NOW;I’m not, hence I believe in nothing more than what I do HERE&NOW;(life, family, love, work etc.)

anything beyond is not of my concern, it’s just ashes and worms

My general view on religion is, that when it stops concerning the mind of the believer and has ANY influence on lives of others, its wrong and should be banned as such.

Religious movements were and are elements of governing. Nothing more.

Personal belief in something is a way of soothing own mind. Nothing more.

PS. Paganism and all primitive (early, not bad) religions are (for me) just a way of understanding world through animating nature.

I should write a book; ‘The Rise of the Unseen Dogmas’. Did anyone disagree with the version of the ontological argument I posted?

I dont believe ontology exists

what has studying birds got to do with religion?