On December 14th 2003, the world learned that Saddam Hussein had been captured by US Marines. The pictures of his arrest soon spread around the world. From the official news briefings we also learned that Saddam had been hiding in a hole in the ground when the US Marines found him. This official story has now been put into serious doubt by a US Marine named Nadim Abou Rabeh. Ex-Marine Sgt. Nadim Abou Rabeh claims that he was part of a 20 man search force that found Saddam hiding in a house. Only after heavy resistance did the ex-dictator surrender to his captors. Should we believe the official story or has the world been lied to again by the Bush regime. And if so, what were they trying to achieve by fabricating such a story?
What would the US gain by saying Saddam sat in a hole instead of saying he was caught after a fierce firefight?
If they captured him after a good ol´firefight at the NoMorale-ranch that would have been an equaly good headline.
So what this sorry assed goatfucker says makes no sense. Only thing I can come up with is that he wants some fame. Ofcourse everybody starts saying he wasn´t part of any service and a lot of more denials etc. and he will start moaning that´s because he was part of a very superdeepblackhushhush-program.
A well the pyramids were only possible because some aliens came to help us… and we all know how credible that is. So, no serious doubts. Sorry.
And now some serious pr0n plse wiht that new bitchtorrent
http://www.2001sexe.com/pornostars/
so an nice open dir for here
of course there is something to gain!!
it’s not very bravery to hide in a hole, instead of defending yourself with agun!!!
maybe the Americans wanted to humiliate him more, hoping of more support from the Irakis!!!
http://www.nudebabescentral.com/gallery/yanacova01/images/
I am with JB on this one. That is the only reason I can think off. By portraying Saddam as a coward they could try to break teh back of any resistance still loyal to Saddam. ‘look while you try to defend him from us, he hides like a dog in the corner’ sort of thing.
But even then. If that fight was so heroic the bastard should have died like his sons.
If there was a fierce fire fight then why were no soldiers so much as even shot. Saddam had a gun but didn’t use it because in reality...he is a little bitch. We all saw the pictures of him after his capture and he didn’t look to defiant. The man is a coward. You don’t have to look for conspiracy in everything.
@tak1885
did you read the story. A US Marine got killed during the fire fight.
whats funny, is that if you look at the pictures, saddam is clearly caught by US Army troops. how do i know? because Marines BDU’s are digitized and do not have the same pattern. so your story has some miss information in it.
I hate to tell the RAGHEAD rabeh but he is a liar the Marines did not capture the Son Of A Bitch Saddam it was the Army’s 4th Infantry Division it is just more arab BULSHIT
I think Nadim Abou Rabeh lying he said, “We captured him after fierce resistance during which a Marine of Sudanese origin was killed,” he said. I searched icasualties.org and DOD site there weren’t any Marine deaths Dec.13, 14 2003 the day Saddam was captured. Moreover there weren’t any Marine deaths in December 03’.
Willy Wanka,
Just so you know, not all of the DCUs the Marines wear are digitized (MARPAT).
Rants & Raves & Flames & Trolls on Saddam’s Hole A Hoax???